Another convention, meeting between October 14, 1850 - August 1, 1851, wrote Virginia's third constitution.
The 1851 constitution finally eliminated the requirement of voters to own a certain amount of property. With a few exceptions, all white males over 21 years of age who met the residency requirements became eligible to vote. "Freehold" voting was an objective primarily of western Virginians, since a higher percentage of them had been blocked from voting by the property minimums in the 1776 and 1830 constitutions.1
The executive branch structure was revised by eliminating the role of the General Assembly in choosing the governor, and holding direct elections for that position. The Council of State, originally eight people elected by the legislature in the 1776 constitution and then three people in the 1830 constitution, was completely eliminated. In the colonial era and under the previous two constitutions, if a governor died or resigned his office before completing his term, the longest-serving member of the Council of State would serve until the General Assembly met and choose a new governor. Abolishing the Council of State eliminated that possibility, so the new constitution created the elected position of Lieutenant Governor so there would be a backup official.
The 1851 constitution also gave voters the right to elect the Attorney General, as well as the Governor and Lieutenant Governor. If an election for those offices was contested, or if a vote ended in a tie, the General Assembly retained the authority to determine the winner. That provision remains in the current state costitution.2
The power of the General Assembly was also reduced by having direct elections for circuit court and county court judges (which were equivalent then to county boards of supervisors today). The number of General Assembly sessions were cut in half, by shifting from annual to biannual meetings. Time limits were also defined for the biannual session.
In the 1850-1851 constitutional convention, westerners again failed to get voting districts realigned enough to overcome the dominance of the General Assembly by voters living east of the Blue Ridge. In the 152-member House of Delegates, 66 seats (43%) were allocated to districts west of the Blue Ridge. The percentage of western districts in the State Senate was lower, at 38%. In that 50-member body, only 19 State Senators would be elected from west of the Blue Ridge.
Eastern landowners were unwilling to give up their guarantee of legislative control that was enshrined in the 1830 constitution. Easterners continued to cite their justification of excessive representation for districts east of the Blue Ridge, based on the claim that government was responsible for protecting property and the greatest property values were east of the mountains.
Easterners also feared that westerners might be more willing to accept emancipation of enslaved people in the future, since the vast majority of such "property" was located east of the mountains.
The 1851 constitution did include a requirement for the General Assembly to reapportion how its members would be elected 15 years in the future. That provided a temporary resolution of the heated controversy regarding how voters in eastern Virginia had a greater share of elected representatives compared to voters in western Virginia.
If the General Assembly could not reach a reapportionment deal in 1865 and every ten years afterwards, the 1851 constitution required to governor to organize an election so voters could resolve the redistricting issue directly. The choices would involve districts with boundaries drawn to equalize just the white population, and districts with boundaries drawn on a "mixed basis" to balance both the white upulation and the assessed value of property within the district.
The power of the eastern bloc enabled it to protect slaveowners in Tidewater and the Piedmont from the threat of confiscatory taxation. The 1851 constitution required that all property had to be taxed at the same rate, and "property" included enslaved people that were more common east of the Blue Ridge.
If the General Assembly increased the tax rate to raise more revenue from wasterners who owned slave property, then the tax rate would increase just as much on land owned by farmers without slaves. More significantly, the constitution also defined a $300 cap on the value of enslaved adults and prohibited any tax on people less than 12 years old, ensuring the tax burden would fall primarily upon western landowners:3
Those provisions ended up subsidizing slaveowners, as the value of their "property" grew far beyond those caps throughout the 1850's. The western residents, who owned fewer enslaved people, paid an increasing percentage of the state property tax because of the $300 cap. Dissatisfaction reached the point where westerners discussed splitting the state.
The new constitution was ratified by the voters on October 24, 1850. It went into effect on January 12, 1851.4