Virginia-Tennessee Boundary

the Tennessee-Virginia border today has evolved from the 36° 30' parallel of latitude defined in 1665 to separate Virginia-North Carolina
the Tennessee-Virginia border today has evolved from the 36° 30' parallel of latitude defined in 1665 to separate Virginia-North Carolina
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

The modern Virginia-Tennessee boundary line was surveyed originally as a border between North Carolina and Virginia.

Tennessee officials were not involved in making the first boundary surveys because there was no State of Tennessee until 1796, when the western part of North Carolina became a new state. Tennessee officials had their greatest impact on the Virginia-Tennessee border in 1802, and then later lawsuits and political compromises finalized the straight lines, notches and zig-zags in the boundary.

The first key decision shaping the modern Virginia-Tennessee border was made in 1663, when Charles II granted the Charter of Carolina to reward eight supporters who helped him during the English Civil War. King Charles II initially declared that the Virginia-North Carolina border would run along the 36° parallel of latitude. In 1665, he modified the charter to grant the new colony control over all of the Albemarle Sound, by moving the boundary north to the 36° 30' parallel. In theory, the Virginia/Tennessee border was supposed to follow the westward extension of that 1665 boundary, the 36° 30' parallel of latitude.

Surveyors first started to mark a line along that 36° 30' parallel in 1710. That project failed to define any portion of the boundary. North Carolina's Edward Moseley accused the Virginia surveyors of using inaccurate instruments, and the Virginians accused Moseley of a conflict of interest as he speculated in lands along the border. (Both sides were correct.)

William Byrd II's famous "dividing line" survey of 1728 was more successful. It marked a boundary from the Atlantic Ocean inland all the way to the Dan River, finally stopping at Peters Creek.

In 1749, Peter Jefferson and Joshua Fry surveyed 90 miles west from Peters Creek until stopping at Steep Rock Creek (probably Laurel Creek, a tributary of Holston River east of modern-day Damascus). The western edge of that North Carolina-Virginia colonial boundary line became one point on the Virginia-Tennessee boundary. The rest of the Virginia-Tennessee boundary was defined after Virginia declared independence from England in 1776 and became a state.

the 1749 survey of the Virginia-North Carolina border stopped at Steep Rock Creek (probably modern Laurel Creek)
the 1749 survey of the Virginia-North Carolina border stopped at Steep Rock Creek (probably modern Laurel Creek)
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the most inhabited part of Virginia containing the whole province of Maryland with part of Pensilvania, New Jersey and North Carolina. (drawn by Joshua Fry & Peter Jefferson in 1751)

The instruments of the day were imperfect, and accounting for the variation of magnetic north required constant refinement as the surveys moved westward. Fry and Jefferson drifted nearly five miles north of the 36° 30' parallel of latitude. The tilt becomes more obvious the further west one looks today.

perhaps due to incorrect adjustments for magnetic declination, Fry and Jefferson's survey line tilted towards the north as they moved westward in 1749
perhaps due to incorrect adjustments for magnetic declination, Fry and Jefferson's survey line tilted towards the north as they moved westward in 1749
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

The population on the southwestern frontier increased after the French and Indian War. Virginia began creating new counties there in 1770, carving Botetourt out of Augusta County. In 1772, Fincastle County was created out of Botetourt, and in 1776 Fincastle County was divided into Montgomery, Washington, and Kentucky counties. Later partitions after continued population growth created the current county boundaries on Virginia's borders with North Carolina and Tennessee.

For those planning to purchase land on the frontier in the 1770's, knowing the location of the Virginia-Carolina border was essential. Surveys had to be completed by authorized county surveyors and filed in the appropriate county courthouse. Settlers wanted to know whether they should file their surveys and land warrants in Virginia or North Carolina courts, and which courts would resolve disputes. State officials wanted to receive tax revenue from lands sold to settlers.

A major stimulus for clarifying the colonial boundaries beyond the Blue Ridge was the decision of the British government to ban settlement west of the Proclamation Line of 1763. Officials in London were struggling to find ways to repay the money borrowed for the Seven Years War (known as the French and Indian War in Virginia). The two obvious solutions were to increase revenue and reduce costs of government.

Fincastle County was created in 1772
Fincastle County was created in 1772
Source: Library of Virginia, Fincastle County

Proposals to increase revenue including imposing new taxes on the North American colonists, since they had benefitted immensely from the expense of Britain sending warships and troops to seize the Ohio River Valley and Canada and eliminate the French from those regions. The colonists failed to see the military, political, or financial benefits of raising colonial taxes. Colonial resistance to a variety of different taxes proposed by London officials led to the Stamp Act crisis in 1765, the Boston Tea Party in 1771, and ultimately the American Revolution in 1775.

The efforts to reduce costs of government led to the Proclamation Line of 1763. It was intended to reduce the costs of maintaining British military forces on the western frontier of the colonies.

Settlers who encroached onto lands claimed by Native American tribes triggered a response. Shawnee and Cherokee warriors sought to stop the "trespass" onto their hunting grounds, and burned cabins and killed families on the western edge of Virginia. The colonists called the Native American actions "massacres" and organized incursions into the Ohio River watershed that destroyed villages, cut down cornfields, killed Native Americans, and spurred yet another round of retaliation.

The obvious solution, at least as officials in London viewed the situation, was to negotiate treaties with the Native Americans, define boundary lines, and limit new colonial settlement to lands that had been ceded by the Native Americans to the colonies. Minimizing Native American-settler conflicts by separating the two groups would minimize the number of troops required to protect colonists from Native American raids.

A proclamation by King George III in 1763 put Americans on notice that the "growth boundary" would block settlement in most of the Ohio River watershed. The next step was to negotiate with different tribes and sign treaties to define what lands would still be controlled by Native American groups, what territory would be ceded to Britain, and how the boundaries would be marked.

Starting in 1768, British and colonial officials arranged for a peace treaty between the Iroquois and the Cherokee. The goal was to stop the traditional long-distance raids by those two nations through territory which the British planned to acquire from each Native American nation.

Later in 1768, the Iroquois signed the Treaty of Fort Stanwix. In that treaty, they abandoned Iroquois (but only Iroquois...) claims to the territory south of the Ohio River from Fort Pitt (Pittsburgh) downstream to the mouth of the Tennessee River.

At nearly the same time, other British officials concluded the Treaty of Hard Labor with the Cherokees. The Cherokee agreed to relinquish their rights to much of the same territory south of the Ohio River, including large portions of modern West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. 1

extending the 1749 survey of the southern boundary of Virginia was triggered by increased settlement on the frontier and two treaties with the Cherokee
extending the 1749 survey of the southern boundary of Virginia was triggered by increased settlement on the frontier and two treaties with the Cherokee
Source: National Park Service, 1768 Boundary Line Treaty Map

In the Treaty of Hard Labor Donelson's Line, a 1770 survey intended to mark the boundary between British ad Cherokee lands. The Lochaber 1 Virginia was also determined to define the border in order to exert control over its territory, rather than leave settlers "in a state of nature" without effective government. Land speculators exacerbated the confusion when they tried to establish independent governments and then collect revenue from sale of the land claimed by Virginia.

Efforts to establish the Virginia-North Carolina boundary were renewed during the American Revolution, despite the disruption of British invasions of Virginia throughthe Chesapeake Bay. A critical number of settlers on the western edge of Virginia and North Carolina chose to fight for independence, including the "Overmountain Men" who helped defeat the Bristish at the Battle of King’s Mountain in 1780.

Those settlers made clear that the new state governments had to reciprocate and ensure opportunities to acquire land. "Land hunger" by settlers on the frontier disprupted relationships with Native American tribes (especially Cheokee and Shawnee), but no American equivalent of the Proclamation of 1763 would be acceptable.

In the 1775 Treaty of Sycamore Shoals, Richard Henderson and other land speculators tried to bypass the colonial governments east of the Blue Ridge. The Transylvania Company purchases whatever rights the Cherokees had to the land between the Kentucky and Cumberland rivers, and then tried to create a 14th colony of Transylvania.

In 1784, after the American Revolution ended, several North Carolina counties west of the Blue Ridge petitioned the new Congress to admit them as the State of Franklin, the 14th state. Congress rejected the proposed State of Franklin. North Carolina regained control and finally ceded its land claims to the Congress, which established the Southwest Territory in 1790 and accepted Tennessee into the union in 1796.

Virginia was bordered by the Southwestern Territory between 1790-96, after North Carolina ceded its western lands to the national government and before the State of Tennessee was accepted into the Union (much of southwestern Virginia became the State of Kentucky in 1792)
Virginia was bordered by the Southwestern Territory between 1790-96, after North Carolina ceded its western lands to the national government and before the State of Tennessee was accepted into the Union (much of southwestern Virginia became the State of Kentucky in 1792)
Source: Library of Congress, Map of the state of Kentucky: with the adjoining territories, 1795

During the middle of the American Revolution in 1779, Virginia and North Carolina agreed on a new survey to extend their common boundary to the west. The decision came thirty years after Fry and Jefferson had stopped at Steep Rock Creek, and the states of Tennessee and Kentucky had not been created yet.

Virginia and North Carolina appointed surveyors and commissioners to mark their joint boundary once again. Virginia was represented by Dr. Thomas Walker and General Daniel Smith, while Colonel Richard Henderson, William Bailey Smith, and John Williams represented North Carolina.

the 1755 John Mitchell map showed Thomas Walker's cabin, built on the Cumberland River in 1750 as he explored beyond the Cumberland Gap for the Loyal Land Company - and the end point of the 1749 survey 336 miles from the sea
the 1755 John Mitchell map showed Thomas Walker's cabin, built on the Cumberland River in 1750 as he explored beyond the Cumberland Gap for the Loyal Land Company - and the end point of the 1749 survey "336 miles from the sea"
Source: Library of Congress, John Mitchell, A map of the British and French dominions
in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements

Both teams had representatives with strong personal agendas. Walker was active in the Loyal Land Company, with a grant from Virginia for 800,000 acres in southwestern Virginia. Henderson was the prime mover behind the Transylvania effort, through which he had hoped to acquire title to 20 million acres in the Kentucky region of Virginia. (Ultimately, Virginia and North Carolina each ended up giving Henderson 200,000 acres to eliminate his claim and "quiet the title" to the land grants issued by those states.)

the 36° 30' boundary established in the 1665 charter was supposed to be extended westward by the 1779-80 survey
the 36° 30' boundary established in the 1665 charter was supposed to be extended westward by the 1779-80 survey
Source: Library of Congress, Partie occidentale de la Virginie, Pensylvanie, Maryland, et Caroline (1781)

In 1779, the Virginia and Carolina commissioners/surveyors could not find evidence of that 30-year old survey by Fry/Jefferson and North Carolinians. Instead, in 1779 the two survey teams agreed to begin the new survey by defining the latitude of 36° 30' to be a little over one mile north of where Fry and Jefferson had stopped their survey at Steep Rock Creek. That is why the current Tennessee-Virginia boundary starts on Burnt Hill near Green Cove Creek, a tributary of the Laurel Fork that drains into the South Fork of the Holston River.

After 45 miles of moving west, the surveyors reached Carters Valley near modern-day Kingsport, Tennessee. There, the North Carolinians concluded that the line being surveyed was located two miles to the south of 36° 30' and thus giving too much land to Virginia. In their opinion, Walker was trying to establish a claim to territory that belonged to North Carolina.2

Walker and the Virginia surveyors ignored the objections of the North Carolinians and kept blazing the "Walker Line" to the west. In hopes of resolving the disagreement, the North Carolina members - plus one Virginia commissioner, General Daniel Smith - moved north two miles and surveyed back towards Steep Rock Creek. However, Smith concluded halfway back that he had made a mistake and the original line was correct, so he rejoined Walker.

The North Carolina surveyors reached their starting point, started again, and marked a separate "Henderson Line" from Steep Rock Creek to Cumberland Mountain. The North Carolina representatives stopped at Cumberland Mountain and went home, but the Virginia team kept surveying to the west. They went all the way to the Tennessee River.

As a result of the disagreement, the two sets of surveyors created a two-mile gap west of Steep Rock Creek and Cumberland Gap. North Carolina surveyors defined the Henderson Line on the north, while Virginia surveyors marked the Walker Line on the south. In this two-mile "gore" (gap) of unclear ownership, legal authority was unclear and neither state could collect taxes effectively.3

Walker, Smith and the Virginia surveyors kept surveying west beyond the Cumberland Gap. At Deer Fork, 124 miles west of their starting point at Steep Rock Creek, the Virginians skipped ahead 109 miles to the Cumberland River. There they determined through astronomical observations the latitude of 36 degrees 30 minutes, and surveyed 41 more miles west to the Tennessee River. At the river, they ended up being over 17 miles north of the desired 36° 30' - which would have benefitted North Carolina, had the commissioners/surveyors stayed with the project.4

The debate about how to resolve the disputed Virginia-North Carolina boundary on its western end continued after both Virginia and North Carolina ceded control over that land to the independent states of Kentucky and Tennessee.

Kentucky lost territory to Tennessee, due to the errors that caused the Walker Line to be located too far north. In 1820, Kentucky accepted the Walker Line as its boundary, but Tennessee gave Kentucky title to all the vacant land between 36° 30' and the Walker Line. The two states also agreed to move the boundary south to the 36° 30' parallel between the Tennessee-Mississippi rivers, to avoid repeating the error created by the Walker Line veering too far north on the eastern side of the Tennessee River.5

the Kentucky-Tennessee border was adjusted west of the Tennessee River to mitigate for errors made by the 1779-80 Walker Line survey
the Kentucky-Tennessee border was adjusted west of the Tennessee River to mitigate for errors made by the 1779-80 Walker Line survey
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

If the 1665 decision by Charles II had been implemented, the Virginia-Tennessee border should match the 36° 30' parallel of latitude. In reality, the border is based on the inadequate expertise and equipment of the 18th Century, followed by lawsuits and political compromises.

The actual boundary is defined by on-the-ground marks and monuments - physical indications such as blazes on trees or stones placed into the earth - that were made by the surveyors. The ability of Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) technology to define the 36° 30' parallel more accurately is irrelevant in modern land ownership disputes.

Pioneer surveyors dragged iron chains west from the Atlantic Ocean, cutting a path through the natural vegetation and documenting the bearings/distances between monuments. In legal disputes since then, the monuments set on the ground are almost always defined as the property boundaries, no matter what documents may have said were supposed to be the dividing lines between colonies/states.

The southern boundary line of Virginia with Tennessee has curves and notches. The reasons for the shifts in the Virginia-Tennessee border are not clear. Suppositions include the effect on instruments of iron deposits in the Iron Mountains, in addition to the traditional tales about hard-drinking surveyors losing their sense of direction and strong-willed landowners convincing the surveyors to avoid cutting through pre-existing parcel boundaries.

One author concluded that many of the explanations for the adjustments were just made-up tales, and the most likely reason is that landowners requested boundary adjustments in order to keep their property in one state or the other. In his opinion, the large notch between North Carolina and Bristol was:6

probably is due to the fact that the land there is of little value and very rough; also the commissioners considered that they had discretion in the matter, and possibly followed Byrd in the way of accommodating the inhabitants

Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson displayed the Tennessee-Virginia border as a straight line
Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson displayed the Tennessee-Virginia border as a straight line
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the most inhabited part of Virginia containing the whole province of Maryland with part of Pensilvania, New Jersey and North Carolina

In 1802, Virginia and Tennessee agreed to survey a compromise line. Each state would be given half the territory between the Henderson Line and the Walker Line. Commissioners for Virginia were Joseph Martin, Creed Taylor, and Peter Johnston. Commissioners for Tennessee were General John Sevier, Moses Fisk, and General Joseph Rutledge, and surveyors were Brice Martin and Nathan Markland. The Compromise Line of 1802 ran from Whitetop Mountain to Cumberland Gap. Martin and Markland marked blazes in a diamond pattern, so that 1802 survey is known as the "diamond line."7
diamond blaze of 1802 survey
diamond blaze of 1802 survey

At Virginia's southwestern tip, the boundary with Kentucky is based on the Walker Line. The Virginia/Tennessee boundary is based on the 1802 compromise between the Walker/Henderson lines, so it is located further south - creating a jog at the eastern end of the Tennessee/Kentucky line.8

how the Virginia/Tennessee and Virginia/Kentucky boundaries are not aligned at Cumberland Gap
how the Virginia/Tennessee and Virginia/Kentucky boundaries are not aligned at Cumberland Gap
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online)

Virginia tried to re-open the question of the boundary line location in 1858, 1870, and then again in 1887. Tennessee stuck to the 1802 compromise line, so the states ended up settling their boundary through a lawsuit.

Tennessee won the case. In 1893, the Supreme Court ruled in Virginia v. Tennessee:9

The claim of Virginia is that by the charters of the English sovereigns, under which the colonies of Virginia and North Carolina were formed, the boundary line between them was intended and declared to be a line running due west from a point on the Atlantic Ocean on the parallel of latitude 36 degrees and 30 minutes north, and that the State of Tennessee, having been created out of the territory formerly constituting a part of North Carolina, the same boundary line continued between her and Virginia, and the contention of Virginia is that the boundary line claimed by Tennessee does not follow this parallel of latitude, but varies from it by running too far north, so as to unjustly include a strip of land about one hundred and thirteen miles in length and varying from two to eight miles in width, over which she asserts and unlawfully exercises sovereign jurisdiction.

On the other hand, the claim of Tennessee is that the boundary line, as declared in the English charters, between the colonies of Virginia and North Carolina, was run and established by commissioners appointed by Virginia and Tennessee after they became states of the Union, by Virginia in 1800, and by Tennessee in 1801, and that the line they established was subsequently approved in 1803 by the legislative action of both states, and has been recognized and acted upon as the true and real boundary between them ever since, until the commencement of this suit, a period of over eighty-five years, and the contention of Tennessee is that the line thus established and acted upon is not open to contestation as to its correctness at this day, but is to be held and adjudged to be the real and true boundary line between the states, even though some deviations from the line of the parallel of latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north may have been made by the commissioners in the measurement and demarcation of the line.

The Supreme Court decision confirmed that the line on the ground that had been the basis for election districts, tax collections, and real estate records was the boundary, no matter what the charter said. Virginia had benefitted from such reasoning in its dispute with Maryland over the low-water mark being the boundary along the Potomac River, and Virginia lost its claim to land in Tennessee by the same rationale:
A boundary line between states or provinces which has been run out, located, and marked upon the earth, and afterwards recognized and acquiesced in by the parties for a long course of years, is conclusive.

The court case did clarify the mysterious notch in the boundary between North Carolina and Virginia at Bristol. When the 1802 line was resurveyed in 1901, the commissioners (who also served as the surveyors, in order to minimize cost) explored east and west of the notch. They looked for blazes on trees, in case the "compromise" surveyors had marked straight lines in the field in 1802, but then altered the location of the lines in their final report for some unknown reason.

The 1901 surveyors were able to find the distinctive diamond blazes from 1802, plus others remaining from an 1858 survey when Virginia tried to re-open the boundary question. In 1901, no marks were found on trees east or west of the notch that varied from the 1802 surveyors. The zig-zag boundary with a notch in the final 1802 compromise survey reflected the original field work.10

The Supreme Court case documented that the 1901 surveyors were confident that the 1802 effort had started from Burnt Hill. Defining that corner of Virginia/Tennessee was apparently the first compromise of that survey. Though the 1802 survey report says they started "on the summit of the mountain generally known as the White Top mountain," the line actually began on Burnt Hill, halfway between the top of White Top mountain and the Walker Line to the south.

Tennessee-Virginia Border
Tennessee-Virginia border, with notch east of Bristol
Source: National Atlas

Burnt Hill, starting point for the compromise diamond line surveyed in 1802
Burnt Hill, eastern starting point for the compromise "diamond line" surveyed in 1802
Source: USGS 1:24,000 topgraphic quadrangle, downloaded from NC OneMap)

Virginia did manage to convince Tennessee to make one adjustment in 1901. The 1802 line ran through Bristol, which had developed on both sides of the state boundary. (The Virginia side was originally the community of Goodson.) The state line was moved, in a bi-state agreement ratified by the US Congress, from the sidewalk on the northern side of the main street to the middle of the street.

This occurred after the "Water Works War of 1889." That dispute was triggered by a Tennessee-based water company trying to extend its lines to serve customers in Virginia, and a Virginia-based officer arrested the company president as he was working on the project. The Virginia-based utility then tried to construct its own pipeline down Main Street. Sheriffs from both Tennessee and Virginia brought their deputies to the scene, and the Tennessee sheriff raised a posse comitatus of several hundred volunteers.

Though violence was a real possibility, the "war" ended in a scene worthy of a Charlie Chaplin comedy episode. The Tennessee sheriff tried to serve a warrant on the Virginia officer who had arrested the president of the Tennessee company. The officer squirmed away, fell into the pipeline ditch - and the sheriff fell in on top of him. Another officer defused the situation, inviting them both to get up and go home until the lawyers could sort it out.11

Cumberland Gap

in 1897, the Holston River had not yet been dammed and flowed freely across the Tennessee-Virginia border
in 1897, the Holston River had not yet been dammed and flowed freely across the Tennessee-Virginia border
Source: US Geological Survey (USGS), Bristol 1:250,000 topographic quadrangle (1897)
(from ESRI USGS Historical Topographic Map Explorer)

Links

presumed NC-VA border, 1779
presumed NC-VA border, 1779 (assuming a straight line...)
Source: History of the South Carolina cession, and the Northern boundary of Tennessee by William Robertson Garrett (p.2)

References

1. "1768 Boundary Line Treaty of Fort Stanwix," Fort Stanwix National Monument, National Park Service, http://www.nps.gov/fost/historyculture/1768-boundary-line-treaty.htm (last checked January 24, 2015)
2. US Supreme Court, Poole v. Fleeger, in United States Supreme Court reports Volume 9, pp.690-694, published by Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, http://books.google.com/books?id=ZHoYAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA690 (last checked August 19, 2009)
3. Redd, John, "Reminiscences of Western Virginia, 1770-1790," Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. VII, No. 1, 1899, p. 242 http://books.google.com/books?id=99ERAAAAYAAJ (last checked August 19, 2009)
4. "Surveyors Error In Drawing 'Walker Line' Kept Tennessee, Kentucky At Odds For Many Years," TNGenWeb, http://www.tngenweb.org/campbell/hist-bogan/surveyor.html (last checked October 4, 2014)
5. US Supreme Court, Poole v. Fleeger, p. 694
6. Marshall, Park. "The Boundary Lines of Tennessee," published in The Resources of Tennessee, Tennessee Geological Survey, v. 7, 1918, pp.90-108, https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=k-1IAAAAMAAJ (last checked October 4, 2014)
7. Whitney, Henry D., Land Laws of Tennessee (1891), p. 634 http://books.google.com/books?id=I7kZAAAAYAAJ (last checked October 23, 2004)
8. Van Zandt, Franklin K., Boundaries of the United States and the Several States, p.110 Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1976.
9. US Supreme Court, Virginia v. Tennessee, 148 U. S. 503, http://supreme.justia.com/us/148/503/case.html (1893) (last checked August 17, 2009)
10. Tennessee v. Virginia, 190 U.S. 64 (1903) http://supreme.justia.com/us/190/64/case.html (last checked August 17, 2009)
11. Taylor, Oliver, Historic Sullivan: a history of Sullivan County, Tennessee, King Printing Co., Bristol TN, 1909, pp.244-246, http://books.google.com/books?id=8fITAAAAYAAJ (last checked August 26, 2009)

in 1749 Fry and Jefferson stopped surveying at Laurel Creek (formerly Steep Rock Creek), east of modern-day Damascus, Virginia
in 1749 Fry and Jefferson stopped surveying at Laurel Creek (formerly Steep Rock Creek), east of modern-day Damascus, Virginia
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

mapmakers as late as 1796 showed a Virginia-Tennessee border extending straight to the Cumberland Mountains, based on the 36° 30' parallel of latitude defined in 1665 to separate Virginia-North Carolina
mapmakers as late as 1796 showed a Virginia-Tennessee border extending straight to the Cumberland Mountains, based on the 36° 30' parallel of latitude defined in 1665 to separate Virginia-North Carolina
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the United States exhibiting post roads & distances : the first sheet comprehending the nine northern states, with parts of Virginia and the territory north of Ohio (1796)

Boundaries and Charters of Virginia
Virginia Places