Virginia-Pennsylvania Boundary

Today there is no common border between Virginia and Pennsylvania - but between 1681 and 1863, the southwestern border of Pennsylvania was shared with Virginia. Exactly what territory was Virginia and what was Pennsylvania was a challenge that took about 100 years to resolve.

Pennsylvanial borders
Source: National Atlas

The western boundary of Pennsylvania was established in William Penn's 1681 charter, and was dependent upon the longitude of the eastern boundary:1

The said Lands to extend westwards five degrees in longitude, to bee computed from the said Easterne Bounds...

William Penn was determined to acquire the Native American claims to his land by legitimate negotiations and purchases, but his efforts to negotiate with fellow Europeans claiming land in North America were even more difficult.

The fundamental problem with Penn's charter was that the point of beginning for his southeastern boundary did not exist. Penn's charter started with the intersection of a circle 12 miles from New Castle (now located in Delaware) and the beginning of the 40th degree of latitude, "on the South by a Circle drawne at twelve miles distance from New Castle Northward and Westward unto the beginning of the fortieth degree of Northern Latitude."

Why King Charles II may have thought the 40th parallel was appropriate
Why King Charles II may have thought the 40th parallel was an appropriate southern boundary for Pennsylvania: John Smith's map located it just at the northern tip of the Chesapeake Bay2
(NOTE: Smith's map was oriented with north to the right, and top of the map was the western edge)
Source: Library of Congress, Virginia / discovered and discribed by Captayn John Smith, 1606

However, the 40th degree is so far north of New Castle that the lines never intersect. The geographic impossibility in the 1681 charter created great confusion between the Calverts of Maryland, the Penns of Pennsylvania, and even the gentry of Virginia.

Some Pennsylvania officials tried to expand their claim by asserting that the "beginning" of the 40th degree of latitude was the 39th parallel, and therefore all land north of the 39th degree of latitude was included in Penn's grant. That extra degree of latitude would have moved the Maryland-Pennsylvania boundary to the south by roughly 69 miles.3

the 40th degree line of latitude runs through Philadelphia, and does not intersect a circle with a 12 mile diameter centered on New Castle
the 40th degree line of latitude runs through Philadelphia, and does not intersect a circle with a 12 mile diameter centered on New Castle
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the British and French dominions in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements

The southwestern corner of Pennsylvania was defined by Penn's charter; it was five degrees of longitude to the west of the southeastern corner. Until the eastern and southern boundaries of Penn's colony were defined, however, it was impossible to establish the western edge - and without accurate clocks, measuring longtitude accurately on the frontier was a challenge.

Lewis Evans 1752 map showing 40th degree of latitude and spring at head of Potomac River, landmarks which define the future Maryland-Pennsylvania-Virginia borders
Lewis Evans 1752 map showing 40th degree of latitude and "spring" at head of Potomac River,
landmarks which define the future Maryland-Pennsylvania-Virginia borders
Source: Library of Congress A map of Pensilvania, New-Jersey, New-York, and the three Delaware counties

The confusion among the colonists and officials in Londdon was minor compared to the threat from the French. That nation did not accept the western land claims of Penn, Calvert, or the Virginians who asserted that King James I's Second Charter in 1609 granted them land "from sea to sea" and thus control over much of the Ohio River valley.

England and France were rivals for control of land and the North America fur trade since the start of the 17th Century. French-English competition extended inland from the fishing fleets on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland to the Ohio River Valley.

The 1748 Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle settled the War of Austrian Succession, one of the many French/English conflicts in Europe. North America was a minor sideshow in what was known as King George's War. The treaty negotiators who ended the conflict were more concerned with Europe, and failed to resolve the claims of Virginia to lands that the French also claimed in North America.

During King George's War, the colonists had captured Louisbourg (a French fortress on Cape Breton Island in Nova Scotia) with assistance from the British Royal Navy. This was a big deal in North America; it gave the English control over the valuable fishing grounds near Newfoundland.

Louisbourg was far from Virginia, but its return to France in the 1748 Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle indicated how British officials focused on reducing the French threat in Europe and viewed North America as a secondary theater
Louisbourg was far from Virginia, but its return to France in the 1748 Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle indicated how British officials focused on reducing the French threat in Europe and viewed North America as a secondary theater
Source: Library of Congress, John Mitchell, A map of the British and French dominions in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements (1755)

The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle negotiators in Europe undid the capture. The treaty restored that fortress to France in exchange for territory captured by the French in India and Europe. The return of Louisbourg and the failure to resolve French claims to the Ohio River Valley, made clear that English officials based in London considered the western extent of the American colonies to be just a subordinate boundary issue in international negotiations.

The French planned to expand their control of lands west of the Alleghenies. When English explorers were just beginning to penetrate lands west of the Shenandoah Valley in the 1740's, the French took action to link their outposts along the St. Lawrence River to other French settlements at the mouth of the Mississippi River and upriver in the Illinois country.

In 1749, Captain Bienville de Celeron canoed from Montreal down the Ohio River and bthen back up the Miami River to Lake Erie. The French buried lead plates on the Ohio River at various confluences with major creeks, while shouting "Vive le Roi" to establish the claim of the King of France to the Ohio River watershed. Perhaps more importantly, de Celeron chased British traders away from Native American villages.4

Ohio River watershed (in orange)
Ohio River watershed (in orange)
Source: National Atlas

The French planned to build a series of forts along the Ohio River, extending supply lines from Quebec/Montreal on the St. Lawrence River. This would trap the English colonies along the Atlantic Ocean, blocking any expansion west into the Ohio River/Mississippi River watersheds.

French plans were triggered in part by plans of Virginians to expand into the same region. In particular, in 1749 the Lords of Trade in London approved a grant to the Ohio Company for up to 500,000 acres west of the Allegheny Mountains.

The company was formed by members of the Virginia gentry, who wisely included Governor Dinwiddie and the influential merchant John Hanbury in London. Under the terms of the initial grant, in exchange for settling 100 families and building a fort within seven years, the company would earn its first 200,000 acres. In preparation, it sent Christopher Gist to explore around the Forks of the Ohio in 1750 and established a field headquarters and fort at Wills Creek (now Cumberland, Maryland).

In 1752, the Ohio Company got the original 1749 land grant terms altered by the Lords of Trade. The company committed to settling 300 families and building two forts, in exchange for removal of any deadline and for granting the entire 500,000 acres. Location of the land grant was specified in 1752 as:5

on the south side of the river Alleghany between the Kiskiminites Creek and Buffalo Creek, and between Yellow Creek and Cross Creek on the north side (for the first 200,000 acres) and between
the Great Conhaway [Kanawha River] on the southwest, and to the west side of the Alleghany Mountains on the east (for the remaining 300,000 acres)

the Ohio Company, a syndicate of land speculators including key officials in Virginia, obtained rights to survey and sell 500,000 acres in the Ohio River watershed between the Allegheny River and the Kanawha River (including its tributary, the New River)
the Ohio Company, a syndicate of land speculators including key officials in Virginia, obtained rights to survey and sell 500,000 acres in the Ohio River watershed between the Allegheny River and the Kanawha River (including its tributary, the New River)
Source: The Ohio Company, a colonial corporation (facing title page)

The Virginians most concerned about Captain Bienville de Celeron and the French claims were the members of the Ohio Company land syndicate. Shareholders included Thomas Lee, president of the Governor's Council, and Governor Dinwiddie himself. Lawrence Washington was a member until he died from disease in 1752. In 1753, Governor Dinwiddie chose Lawrence's half-brother George to travel to the French fort near Lake Erie during the middle of winter and direct the French to leave the Ohio River.

Viewed from Williamsburg, the Ohio River was in Virginia rather than in Pennsylvania. Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson updated their map of Virginia throughout the 1750's to include information acquired from Gist's journeys and later during the French and Indian War, but always indicated that the Virginia boundary was east of the Forks of the Ohio. That placed the Ohio Company's fort (later Fort Duquesne, Fort Pitt, and finally Pittsburgh) in Virginia.

the Ohio Company started to build a fort at the Forks of the Ohio, but the French seized it and completed Fort Duquesne
the Ohio Company started to build a fort at the Forks of the Ohio, but the French seized it and completed Fort Duquesne
Source: University of Pittsburgh - Darlington Digital Library, Part of the Ohio River... and the courses of Christopher Gist’s first and second tours

A map produced by the father of Patrick Henry in 1770 repeated the Virginia claim that Fort Duquesne/Pittsburgh was west of the Virginia-Pennsylvania boundary.

western Pennsylvania border was located east of Fort Duquesne on the Fry-Jefferson map
western Pennsylvania border was located east of Fort Duquesne on the Fry-Jefferson map
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the most inhabited part of Virginia containing the whole province of Maryland with part of Pensilvania, New Jersey and North Carolina (Joshua Fry and Peter Jefferson)

In England, John Mitchell produced a different map in 1755 to display the English claims on the North American continent. It too identified the lands west of Pennsylvania as "Virginia." The Mitchell map also colored the lands west of the Mississippi River to show Virginia owned the lands between the 36° 30' parallel of latitude and the 40° parallel.

Virginia's control to the Pacific Ocean was defined in the Second Charter in 1609, issued by King James I. The boundary on the north was limited by the 1620 New England charter and later grants to others. Mitchell's map acknowledged Virginia's claims to lands west of Pennsylvania and east of the Illinois river, accepting the Ohio Company's grant, but did not indicate Virginia owned lands above the 40° parallel west of the Illinois River. On the south, Virginia's boundary was defined at the 36° 30' parallel by the 1665 grant of North Carolina to the eight proprietors.

on the 1755 Mitchell map, lands west of the Ohio River and north to Canada were identified as part of Virginia
on the 1755 Mitchell map, lands west of the Ohio River and north to Canada were identified as part of Virginia
Source: Library of Congress, John Mitchell, A map of the British and French dominions in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements

However, Mitchell disagreed with the maps produced by Virginians and placed the Forks of the Ohio within the boundaries of Pennsylvania.

Mitchell map of southwestern Pennsylvania
Mitchell map of southwestern Pennsylvania
the 1755 Mitchell map did not accept Virginia's claim to the Forks of the Ohio - and did not define western Pennsylvania's boundary by a line of longitude 5 degrees west of the eastern boundary of that colony
Source: Library of Congress, John Mitchell, A map of the British and French dominions
in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements

a 1771 version of the Lewis Evans map made clear that Pennsylvania included the Forks of the Ohio
a 1771 version of the Lewis Evans map made clear that Pennsylvania included the Forks of the Ohio
Source: Library of Congress, Lewis Evans, A general map of the middle British colonies in America (1771)

The Virginia claim to the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers (the "Forks of the Ohio River") was the Second Charter issued by King James I in 1609 plus the 1744 Treaty of Lancaster with the Iroquois. During the treaty negotiations, the Iroquois claimed their controlled lands west of the Allegheny Mountains by right of conquest:

"as to what lies beyond the Mountains, we conquered the Nations residing there, and that Land, if the Virginians ever get a good Right to it, it must be by us."6

The Virginians claimed to have purchased those Iroquois rights in the 1744 Treaty of Lancaster. In the 1750's, colonial officials in Williamsburg were willing to assert Virginia's ownership through multiple claims, including right of conquest, initial settlement, and royal grants.

The French, of course, did not feel obliged to honor any English claims. French military expansion into the Ohio River Valley would block the claims of any English colony to the land. French occupation, starting with forts and traders and ultimately settlers, would ensure continued French control over trade with the Native Americans west of the Alleghenies.

The pacifist Quakers in the Pennsylvania legislature were unwilling to raise taxes to confront and potentially fight the French. In contrast, the Virginians were willing to assert their land claims and agressive in their behavior towards the French.

In late 1753, Governor Dinwiddie sent an emissary in the middle of the winter to tell the French to abandon their plans to build a string of new forts from Lake Erie down into the Ohio River valley. That emissary, an ambitious young man named George Washington, carried a specific message from Governor Dinwiddie to the French while they were camped at Fort Le Boeuf south of Lake Erie:7

The Lands upon the River Ohio, in the Western Parts of the Colony of Virginia, are so notoriously known to be the Property of the Crown of Great Britain, that it is a Matter of equal Concern & Surprize to me, to hear that a Body of French Forces are erecting Fortresses, & making Settlements upon that River within His Majesty's Dominions.

The many & repeated Complaints I have receiv'd of these Acts of Hostilities, lay me under the Necessity of sending, in the Name of the King my Master, the Bearer hereof, George Washington Esqr. one of the Adjutants General of the Forces of this Dominion; to complain to you of the Encroachments thus made, & of the Injuries done to the Subjects of Great Britain, in open Violation to the Laws of Nations, & the Treaties now subsisting between the two Crowns.

If these Facts are true, & You still think fit to justify Your Proceedings; I must desire You to acquaint me by whose Authority & Instructions, You have lately marcht from Canada with an arm'd Force, & invaded the King of Great Britain's Territories, in the Manner complain'd of; That according to the Purport & Resolution of Your Answer, I may act agreeable to the Commission I am honour'd with from the King my Master.

However Sir, in Obedience to my Instructions it becomes my Duty to require Your peacable Departure, & that You wou'd forbear prosecuting a Purpose so interruptive of the Harmony & good Understanding which His Majesty is desirous to continue & cultivate with the most Christian King.

I perswade myself You will receive & entertain Major Washington with the Candour & Politeness natural to Your Nation; & it will give me the greatest Satisfaction, if You return him with an Answer suitable to my Wishes, for a very long & lasting Peace between Us
George Washington's map showing Fort Le Boeuf, near Lake Erie
George Washington's map showing Fort Le Boeuf, near Lake Erie
Source: Library of Congress, George Washington's map, accompanying his "journal to the Ohio", 1754

George Washington's path across the Potomac-Ohio watershed divide to Fort Le Boeuf
George Washington's path across the Potomac-Ohio watershed divide to Fort Le Boeuf
Source: Library of Congress, George Washington's map, accompanying his "journal to the Ohio", 1754

Washington relied upon Christopher Gist and a few Native American guides to cross the wilderness and reach Fort Le Boeuf. He was well treated by the French officers there, led by Legardeur de St. Pierre. The French officials, camped in the middle of nowhere during the cold winter, must have been entertained by the company of a young, smart, and well-spoken representative from Williamsburg.

Washington had no military force with him, and no leverage. The French sought to recruit his Native American allies, and may have succeeded in getting one to try to murder Washington during the trip home.

Virginia protests failed to convince the French that they should alter their strategic initiative to occupy the Ohio River Valley. The French politely rejected all of the English claims to the Ohio River and proceded to implement their plans, moving downstream in the spring of 1754.

The French quickly ejected the Ohio Company representatives trying to build Fort Prince George at the Forks of the Ohio. The French built their own Fort Duquesne on that site, advancing the occupation of the Ohio Country initiated with the 1749 expedition of Captain Bienville de Celeron burying lead plates down to the mouth of the Miami River.

Later in 1754, Joshua Fry led the Virginia Regiment on a military expedition to the forks to protect the Virginians and establish an English presence at that strategic location. However, Fry died after falling off his horse and young George Washington assumed command of the Virginia Regiment. He led the colonial military expedition into major failure, both militarily and diplomatically.

Washington attacked a French unit encamped in a Pennsylvania valley (now called Jumonville Glen) away from Fort Duquesne. In the attack, the Virginians killed nearly all of the French, including their leader Joseph Coulon de Villiers de Jumonville. Washington retreated to Great Meadows and erected his own defensive "Fort Necessity" to repel the French military response.

It was a poor tactical decision to stop rather than to keep retreating. After the French and their Indian allies attacked the fort, Washington had to surrender it. As part of the surrender, he signed a document in French (a language he did not read...) that said he had assassinated de Jumonville.

This incident helped to trigger the French and Indian War (or the Seven Years War, as it was known in Europe). The war was an imperial conflict that stretched from India to the Caribbean - and north to Canada.

Fort Le Boeuf was built 15 miles from Lake Erie, across the watershed boundary on a tributary of Allegheny River near modern-day Waterford, Pennslvania
Fort Le Boeuf was built 15 miles from Lake Erie, across the watershed boundary on a tributary of Allegheny River near modern-day Waterford, Pennslvania
Source: ESRI, ArcGIS Online

In 1755, England sent two regiments across the Atlantic Ocean, led by General Braddock, to fight the French and defend colonial land claims. Braddock's expedition from Alexandria to Fort Duquesne was a failure. He was defeated by the French and their Indian allies on the outskirts of the fort. In that battle, Braddock and the opportunity for Virginia to control the Forks of the Ohio both died.

In 1758, the British under John Forbes finally captured Fort Duquesne (and renamed it Fort Pitt). Much to the frustration of the Ohio Company and other land speculators in Virginia, Forbes' army in 1758 had been organized in Pennsylvania. His march westward across the colony established good roads that connected Philadelphia to the Ohio River and created a shorter, better road than the trail used by General Braddock on his expedition from Virginia. As Forbes reported back to London:8

I am in hopes of finding a better way over the Alleganey Mountains, than that from Fort Cumberland which Gen. Braddock took, if so I shall shorten both my March, and my labour of cutting the road about 40 miles, which is a great consideration.

For were I to pursue Mr. Braddocks route, I should save but little labour, as that road is now a brushwood, by the sprouts from the old stumps, which must be cut down and made proper for Carriages, as well as any other Passage that we must attempt.

Trade on Forbes' new road between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh undercut the Virginia colony's economic links up the Potomac River to the Ohio. If Braddock had captured Fort Duquesne and the Ohio Company placed settlers in the Allegheny and Monongahela river valleys, Virginia might have established de facto economic and military control of the upper Ohio River Valley. If "possesion is 99% of the law," then Virginia may have been able to repulse the legitimate land claims made by Pennsylvania based on the boundaries defined in Penn's 1681 charter.

Instead, Virginia's western boundary was reduced in the 1763 Treaty of Paris at the end of the Seven Years War (known as the French and Indian War in North America). The French surrendered their claims to land on the North American continent, the Mississippi River was defined as the western edge of Virginia, and the pacifist Quakers who had controlled Pennsyvania's government were replaced by assertive colonial leaders who ensured their boundaries were established fairly.

Pennsylvania and Maryland officials resolved their disputed boundaries through a 1763-67 survey by two Englishmen. The line they drew became the basis for locating the southern boundary of Pennsylvania, and it also defined the Pennsylvania-Virginia boundary west of Maryland.

the original Lewis Evans map showed an extension of the Mason-Dixon line westward, serving as the Virginia/Pennsylvania border
the original Lewis Evans map showed an extension of the Mason-Dixon line westward, serving as the Virginia/Pennsylvania border
Source: Library of Congress, A general map of the middle British colonies in America

Ever since the proprietary grant to William Penn in 1681, the border between Virginia and Pennsylvania had depended upon defining the eastern edge of Pennsylvania and the southern boundary. The 40th degree of latitude was more than 12 miles north of New Castle, so the key location in Penn's charter to define his boundaries did not exist. Once the eastern and southern edges of Pennsylvania was resolved, however, surveyors could locate a north-south line "five degrees in longitude, to bee computed from the said Easterne Bounds..." to mark the western edge of Pennslvania.

While the western boundary was still unclear, land speculators in Virginia chartered the Ohio Company, speculators in Pennsylvania chartered the Indiana Company, and speculators in Maryland formed the Illinois and Wabash companies. Their claims overlapped each other.

Finally, the Calverts of Maryland and the Penns of Pennsylvania hired Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon ("neutral" surveyors from England) to survey the southern boundary of Pennsylvania/northern boundary of Maryland. Mason and Dixon spent four years (1763-1767) marking the location of the colonial boundaries with monuments on the ground.

They started by marking a spot 15 miles south of Philadelphia, establishing a "point of beginning" accepted by Penns and Calverts as the appropriate latitude for their dividing line. From that marker, Mason and Dixon surveyed east to Delaware and then south to define the Delaware/Pennsylvania border.

After Mason and Dixon started surveying west of the marker defined as the point of beginning, they finally reached a point due north of the headwaters of the Potomac River. At that point, the surveyors were no longer defining the Pennsylvania-Maryland boundary and began defining the boundary between Pennsylvania-Virginia.

Maryland's western border was the "headspring" of the Potomac River. Its western boundary was defined by a north-south line between that natural feature (marked by the Fairfax Stone in 1746) and the Mason-Dixon line. Virginia was located west of the headspring and south of the Mason-Dixon line.

However, due to hostility of the Native Americans in the mountains, Mason and Dixon were unable to complete their east-west line and determine the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania. Their survey stopped on October 9, 1767. They were 233 miles west of the point of beginning, 30 miles west (and north...) of the "head spring" of the Potomac River.

The endpoint of the Mason-Dixon line was 36 miles east of the line that would be "five degrees in longitude... computed from the said Easterne Bounds." That left enough confusion about the boundary lines in the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania for pushy, land-savvy Virginans to sell property that may have been located in Virginia (or maybe not...).

portion of Mason-Dixon line delineating Maryland from Pennsylvania
portion of Mason-Dixon line delineating Maryland from Pennsylvania
Source: Library of Congress - Charles Mason, 1768,
A plan of the west line or parallel of latitude, which is the boundary between the provinces of Maryland and Pensylvania

Mason and Dixon crossed the Monongahela River and quit surveying at Dunkard Creek
Mason and Dixon crossed the Monongahela River and quit surveying at Dunkard Creek
Source: Library of Congress - Charles Mason, 1768,
A plan of the west line or parallel of latitude, which is the boundary between the provinces of Maryland and Pensylvania

the western end of the Mason-Dixon Line is north of modern Morgantown, West Virginia
the western end of the Mason-Dixon Line is north of modern Morgantown, West Virginia
Source: ESRI,
ArcGIS Online

Virginia officials continued to assert their land claims. Pennsylvania claimed the same area as Virginia, and in 1771 created Westmoreland County in the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania. Settlers loyal to Pennsylvania dealt with local officials appointed by the Pennsylvania General Assembly, or elected locally in Pennsylvania-sponsored elections, for legal and political decisions.

Begining in 1775, settlers loyal to Virginia living in the area had the option of relying upon a separate, parallel system of local officials for taxes, elections, and lawsuits. In that year, Lord Dunmore issued a proclamation affirming the Virginia claim to the territory, and the General Assembly designated it as the District of West Augusta. In 1776, Virginia formally created three separate counties from the District of West Augusta - Yohogania, Monongalia, and Ohio.

Dunmore appointed Dr. John Connolly as local captain of the Virginia militia in Pittsburgh, and he was agressive in asserting his authority. (Later, when the American Revolution started, Connolly was equally agressive in his support for King George III.) Westmoreland County (PA) officials arrested Connolly. In turn, he arrested Pennsylvania officials who exercised their authority.

As a result:9

...there were, west of the Alleghanies, not only two different sets of magistrates, with their subordinate officers, constables, assessors, and organized companies of militia, over the same people in the Monongahela valley, but within a few miles of each other had been established two different courts regularly (or irregularly) administering justice under the laws of two different governments.,/dd>

These conditions, with these Virginia Courts exercising judicial powers in the same territory with the courts of Pennsylvania, continued until August 2S, 1780...

Overlapping jurisdiction meant that property rights were very, very confused. One option proposed for resolving the territorial dispute was to create a new state of Westsylvania.

The continuing conflict among states supposedly united to fight the British during the Revolutionary War was a concern to the Continental Congress, as was the difficulty created in managing relations with Native American tribes on the frontier. In 1780, the Congress convinced both Virginia and Pennsylvania to settle their dispute by completing the surveys of Pennsylvania's southwestern and western boundary lines. The states agreed that the line would start at the Delaware River and go 5 degrees west from that point.

Commissioners were appointed by the legislatures of Virginia and Pennsylvania to define the boundary between Virginia and Pennsylvania. Tthe last miles of the Mason-Dixon line were surveyed initially by Alexander McClean of Pennsylvania and Joseph Neville of Virginia in 1782. That was after General Cornwallis had surrendered at Yorktown, but Britain and America were still officially at war.

After the survey was completed, Virginia altered the boundaries of Monongalia and Ohio counties to exclude the land that was located across the boundary inside Pennsylvania. Yohogania County, Virginia, was completely eliminated. The small portion that lay outside of Pennsylvania was incorporated in Ohio County, Virginia. Yohogania County's court records were transferred to Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.10

A permanent survey was finalized in 1784-86. It defined the line north from Pennsylvania's southwestern corner (defined by Alexander McClean of Pennsylvania and Joseph Neville in 1782) to the Ohio River. The Pennsylvania-Virginia border lasted until 1863, when the western counties of Virginia became the separate state of West Virginia.

trespass of Yohogania, Monongalia, and Ohio counties into Pennsylvania
trespass of Yohogania, Monongalia, and Ohio counties into Pennsylvania
Source: Newman Library - Atlas of Historical County Boundaries

By the time the western edge of Pennsylvania, "five degrees in longitude... from the said Easterne Bounds" was finally surveyed, the Continental Congress had passed the Land Ordinance of 1785. It outlined how the lands across the Ohio would be surveyed and sold to settlers in an orderly process; rectangular boundary surveys would be completed before the government's land would be sold.

The confusion created by the overlapping claims of Pennsylvania and Virginia one one example demonstrating that a new approach was required, different from the traditional metes-and-bounds surveys done as settlers selected the best lands and excluded undesired segments of land. One legacy of the border dispute between Virginia and Pennsylvania was the creation of the Public Land Survey System and the survey of township, range, and section boundaries.

Links

References

1. Avalon Project, Charter for the Province of Pennsylvania-1681, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/pa01.asp (last checked August 11, 2009)
2. Monmornier, Mark, Drawing the Line: Tales of Maps and Cartocontroversy, Henry Holt and Company, 1995, p. 109
3. Craig, Neville B., "Lecture upon the controversy between Pennsylvania and Virginia, about the boundary line," December 5th, 1843, pp.22-23, http://www.archive.org/details/lectureuponcontr00crai (last checked August 11, 2009)
4. Galbreath, C. B. (editor), Expedition of Celoron to the Ohio country in 1749, pp.118-123, F. J. Heer Printing Company, Columbus, Ohio 1921, http://books.google.com/books?id=OfUuAAAAYAAJ (last checked August 11, 2009)
5. Leyland, Herbert T., The Ohio Company, a colonial corporation, Historical and Philosophical Society of Ohio, 1921, http://www.archive.org/details/ohiocompanycolon00leylrich (last checked August 11, 2009)
6. "A Treaty Held at the Town of Lancaster, By the Honourable the Lieutenant Governor of the Province, and the Honourable the Commissioners for the Province of Virginia and Maryland, with the Indians of the Six Nations in June, 1744," published online by University of Nebraska Libraries–Electronic Text Center in Lincoln, Nebraska, http://earlytreaties.unl.edu/treaty.00003.html (last checked August 11, 2009)
7. The Diaries of George Washington. Volume I 1748-65, Library of Congress, p. 128, http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwseries1.html (last checked August 10, 2009)
8. "General Forbes Describes his Route to the Forks to William Pitt," July 10th. 1758, http://explorepahistory.com/odocument.php?docId=42 (last checked August 19, 2009)
9. Crumrine, Boyd, The County Court for the District of West Augusta, Virginia, Held at Augusta Town, near Washington, Pennsylyania, 1776-1777: An Historical Sketch, p. 18, http://www.libraries.psu.edu/do/digitalbookshelf/28660758/28660758.part_01.pdf (last checked August 11, 2009)
10. Crumrine, Boyd, Minute Book of the Virginia Court Held for Yohogania County, First at Augusta Town (Now Washington, PA.), and Afterwards On the Andrew Heath Farm Near West Elizabeth; 1776-1780, p.74, published in Annals of Carnegie Museum, Vol. II, 1903, http://www.archive.org/details/annalscarnegiem00musegoog (last checked August 11, 2009)
the District of West Augusta, created in 1775, was carved up into three counties in 1776: Yohogania County (in red), Monongalia County (in green), and Ohio County (in blue)
the District of West Augusta, created in 1775, was carved up into three counties in 1776: Yohogania County (in red), Monongalia County (in green), and Ohio County (in blue)
Source: The Boundary Controversy between Pennsylvania and Virginia, 1748-1785, by Boyd Crumrine
in Annals of the Carnegie Museum, Vol. 1 (1901), opposite p.518

colonial boundary claims of Pennsylvania vs. New York, 1755
colonial boundary claims of Pennsylvania vs. New York, 1755
(Pennsylvania extends to 43rd degree of latitude, but also extends south of 40th degree running through Philadelphia...)
Source: Library of Congress, A map of the British and French dominions in North America, with the roads, distances, limits, and extent of the settlements


Boundaries and Charters of Virginia
The French and Indian War
Virginia Places