Floods and Floodplains

Floods occur when the volume of the river channel is not sufficient to contain the runoff. Try pouring one glass of water into your mouth carefully - if you pour slowly enough, you can swallow the water without spilling any down your chin. Now pour thre glasses of water at once, or pour from one glass a lot faster... and the flood will cascade down your shirt. That's what happened on August 30, 2004 in Richmond, when Tropical Storm Gaston dropped 12 inches of rain in one afternoon onto downtown Richmond. Shockoe Creek filled up and water overflowed the stream banks, covering the Shockoe Slip restaurant district up to the second story of some buildings.

Weather forecasters were surprised that the routine tropical storm traveling north from the Caribbean would stop and create such heavy rains in a small area. Normally, such storms dump just an inch or three on any one place before moving through the area, but Gaston kept on dropping water in the same local area.

note the fast increase in streamflow of Deep Creek in Amelia County, after Tropical Storm Gaston
Note the fast increase in streamflow of Deep Creek in Amelia County, after Tropical Storm Gaston
Source: USGS - Water Resources of Virginia

Virginia residents are accustomed to about 40 inches of rain per year, and the vegetation reflects it. It takes only a few years for grass, shrubs, vines, and/or trees to create a green cover on Virginia's soils, thanks in large part to the rainfall nurturing new plants. The Atlantic Ocean and Chesapeake Bay moderate the Virginia climate, too. In contrast, the dry California desert still shows the scars of tank tracks from military training exercises during World War II, while the human-caused surface disturbances in Virginia are obscured within months in many cases.

Floods are becoming more common, independent of any change in the climate due to global warming, because our developments are modifying patterns of runoff and the shape of the river channels. When a river channel is narrowed, often in an urban area by filling in the marshes on the shoreline, the volume of the channel is decreased. The inevitable consequence, according to the laws of physics, is that the water must either flow faster (eroding the riverbanks and causing trees or structures to fall into the river) or rise higher (causing floods when waters spill over the riverbanks).

Even if the channel is unchanged, development can increase the probability of floods downstream. When forests and grasslands are replaced by impermeable surfaces, such as parking lots, roads, and buildings, the rainfall no longer seeps gradually into the ground. Instead, it rapidly flows to the edge of the pavement or roof. There it may have sufficient energy to wash away soil and vegetation and carve gullies, washing silt into streams and causing water pollution.

More importantly for flood control, the rapid flow of stormwater off the surface of the land creates a higher peak flow downstream. For example, look how a one-inch summer thunderstorm in a small stream valley would create a small rise in water level at a stream gauge downsteam. The storm would deposit an excess of water that could not be absorbed in the ground. In this example, assume that the excess normally would flow downstream over the course of 24 hours, and cause the water level at the stream gauge to rise to a peak of 6" above average flow four hours later.

Building a shopping center in that small stream valley would not change the total amount of water deposited by the same storm. However, covering the ground with impermeable surface would dramatically speed up the the time during which the excess rainfall washed downstream. Instead of taking 24 hours to drain, the excess water may race off the roofs and parking lots into gutters, and be gone soon after the rain stopped (except for a few puddles). The runoff would be faster and the peak water level at the stream gauge would be higher.

A "flashy" stream has an unusually rapid rise in water level and then a quick drop back to the height of the average flow. Over time, such streams will carve deeper channels, incising themselves into the floodplain and creating riverbanks that erode during every storm. Trees and paths along such riverbanks are vulnerable to erosion - look for an unusual number of trees tilting over streams in urban parks, and you're probably seeing signs of runoff that was accelerated by upstream development.

The normal water cycle in Virginia is not always normal. Water in Virginia can cause its own dramatic changes in the surface. The effects of Hurricane Agnes in 1972 are still visible in Nelson County, and the Madison County floods in 1995 substantially reshaped the stream channels in that part of Shenandoah National Park.

National Flood Insurance Program

Congress changed the rules for Federal disaster relief after a flood in 1968. It established the National Flood Insurance Program, ensuring funding for relief but imposing requirements on communities to reduce the potential risk of a flood disaster. A community had to implement a floodplain management ordinance in order for landowners to qualify for Federally-endorsed flood insurance. Few lenders will provide a mortgage for a house that is at-risk and uninsured, so the Federal incentive has convinced 19,000 communities to manage development in floodplains more agressively.

By 2012, 285 Virginia communities participated in the National Flood Insurance Program - including 45 considered "Minimally Flood Prone" or "with No Special Flood Hazard."1

Between 1978-2012, Virginians filed over 40,000 flood insurance claims with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and received nearly $600 million in Federal flood payments. The jurisdictions with the greatest number of claims are all in Hampton Roads - the cities of Norfolk, Hampton, Poquoson, Virginia Beach, and Chesapeake. The only jurisdictions in which Federal flood insurance claims had not been paid were the towns of Clinchport, Lebanon, Iron Gate, Strasbug, and Louisa County.2

In the future, there may be a greater focus on reducing risk as well as paying for recovery after a disaster - but that will require communities to remove existing development from flood-prome areas. The Government Accountability Office reported in 2010:3

currently nearly one in four policyholders does not pay full-risk rates, and many pay a lower subsidized or “grandfathered” rate. Reducing or eliminating less than full-risk rates would decrease costs to taxpayers but substantially increase costs for many policyholders, some of whom might leave the program, potentially increasing postdisaster federal assistance... Increasing mitigation efforts to reduce the probability and severity of flood damage would also reduce flood claims in the long term but would have significant up-front costs that might require federal assistance.

Floodplains

Will Norfolk (and the Rest of Hampton Roads) Drown?

Stormwater Management in Virginia

Links

References

1. "The National Flood Insurance Program Community Status Book - Virginia," Federal Emergency Management Agency, (last checked June 20, 2012)
2. National Flood Insurance Program, Loss Statistics, http://bsa.nfipstat.com/reports/1040.htm (last checked June 20, 2012)
3. "Flood Insurance: Public Policy Goals Provide a Framework for Reform," GAO-11-429T, testimony before the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing, and Community Opportunity, Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives by the Government Accountability Office on March 11, 2011, http://www.gao.gov/assets/130/125706.pdf (last checked June 20, 2012)


Climate
Rivers and Watersheds
Virginia Places